Geneva - China lost an appeal ruling on Wednesday in a World Trade Organization dispute in which Japan and the European Union had complained about Chinese use of anti-dumping duties on high performance, seamless stainless steel tubes. A WTO dispute panel had largely ruled against China in February, but all three parties appealed, and the WTO’s Appellate Body strengthened the case against China, reversing points where the panel had backed Beijing. The dispute was one of a series of often tit-for-tat trade complaints where China and its richer trading rivals sparred to protect their firms’ right to take advantage of each others’ markets, a rivalry that was supercharged by China’s faster economic growth and its growing share of world exports.
China had alleged that Japanese and EU makers of the tubes, which are used in coal-fired power plants, were selling their product at an unfairly cheap price in China, and in 2012 it imposed an “anti-dumping duty” to restrict their imports. Japan and the EU complained to the WTO in a bid to support producers such as Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp, Tubacex S.A in Spain and Salzgitter AG in Germany. At the peak in 2008, Japan exported around $224 million of the pipes to China while the EU made sales of $283 million, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the International Trade Centre (ITC), a joint agency of the WTO and United Nations. In 2012, exports from both the EU and Japan were worth less than $80 million, the ITC figures show. The WTO appeal ruling is final and China will now be asked to bring its rules into line with global trade rules. The EU said in a statement that the ruling was “of systemic importance”. “It highlights again the shortcomings of Chinese trade defence investigations and provides guidance how the WTO rules on price effects, disclosure of essential facts and confidential treatment of information should be applied in the future.” But the WTO ruling may be too late to repair any damage done to Japanese and EU exporters because such decisions do not have retroactive effect. Since the trade dispute erupted, China’s economic growth, including growth in electricity production, has slowed sharply.